Walk a Kb or Two in my Moccasins- Nobody 'splained it to me like that!

Simple answers to Complex Questions and Complex Answers to Simple Questions. In real life, I'm a Greater-Toronto (Canada) Realtor with RE/MAX Hallmark Realty Ltd, Brokerage. I first joined RE/MAX in 1983 and was first Registered to Trade in Real Estate in Ontario in 1974. Formerly known as "Two-Finger Ramblings of a Forensic Acuitant turned Community Synthesizer"

My Photo

- Realtor (2nd or 3rd best you'll likely run into)
- Philosopher King of Real Estate Business in Ontario (self-assessed)
- Likes Public Policy & Governance Discussions
- Likes discussion on being an "Attestant" and First-Century Ecclesias(aka 'primitive congregations)

Wednesday, January 14, 2009

Re-habilitate Section 33 - Notwithstanding what the (l)iberals say to the contrary about "democracy" in a Constitutional Monarchy (for heaven's sake)

Notwithstanding polygamy
Calgary Herald Editorial
Published: Tuesday, January 13, 2009

Dear Ed,

I wish somebody would use the 'perfectly-good' Section 33 aka the "Notwithstanding clause" ... just to prove to Canadians that it is a valid provision of the 1982 amendments to our foundational governance laws.

The Civil Marriages Act would have been an apt example, but the pol's-of-the-day were too intimidated by (or in league with) the "politically correct" crowd to act in a "correct politically" way.

If the "leaders" of that day had done so .... this polygamous marriage/religious discrimination case wouldn't have a leg to stand on AND the Notwithstanding clause would be fully available if the religious freedom argument somehow was "successful" with the Supreme(ly Politically Correct) Court.


Post a Comment

Links to this post:

Create a Link

<< Home

Politics Blog Top Sites