The (great) Speech that sank Harper's nominee
Dear Torstar Editor,
Thank you for publishing the excerpts of Mr G Morgan's speech from Dec 7/05.
I cannot understand why the opponents of his nomination would object to his cut-to-the root problems analysis on:
1)inherent inefficiencies of a unionized-monopoly public service;
2)sloppy checking of immigration from lands-without-laws and simultaneous stringent-restrictions and gov't-sanction of closed-guild behaviour of professional associations towards qualified immigrants;
3)the dependency-creating & sustaining aspects of our Equalization grants and the status-quo-perpetuating decisions of the equalization-receiving governments
(The excerpts on guns and separatists-parties-funded-by-taxpayers were published as incomplete thoughts but are also issues where 'symptoms' have been addressed vs root causes)
In my opinion the gent should be on every committee!
Thank you for publishing the excerpts of Mr G Morgan's speech from Dec 7/05.
I cannot understand why the opponents of his nomination would object to his cut-to-the root problems analysis on:
1)inherent inefficiencies of a unionized-monopoly public service;
2)sloppy checking of immigration from lands-without-laws and simultaneous stringent-restrictions and gov't-sanction of closed-guild behaviour of professional associations towards qualified immigrants;
3)the dependency-creating & sustaining aspects of our Equalization grants and the status-quo-perpetuating decisions of the equalization-receiving governments
(The excerpts on guns and separatists-parties-funded-by-taxpayers were published as incomplete thoughts but are also issues where 'symptoms' have been addressed vs root causes)
In my opinion the gent should be on every committee!